|
|
The Motivations and Questions
At around the time that the BSS was established, several controversies
existed about how succession took place. One controversy dealt with
the nature of the community. At one extreme, tightly unified
communities were assumed to be the basis of succession, while at
the other, the individual -- but interacting -- species populations
were assumed to be the basis of succession. By examining permanent
plots through time, the BSS could show whether communities came and
went as wholes, or whether populations rose and fell through time
based on their individual properties and capacities for interaction.
The second controversy is more subtle, and seems to be the one that
most motivated the Buell's. Dr. F. ? Egler, noted ecological gadfly,
had proposed that the species that would come to predominate in later
successional communities were in fact present right from the start.
This "Initial Floristic Composition" hypothesis was in opposition to
the dominant assumption that species arrived in succession in order
of their dominance. Egler's hypothesis apparently seemed unreasonable
to the Buell's and John Small based on their experience. The only sure
way to tell, however, was to look at specific permanent plots through
time. It is just this design that the BSS employs.
The two controversies have in some ways been solved as a result of
the BSS, other permanent plot studies in forests and fields, and
judicious use of certain chronosequences and experiments.
Consequently, contemporary succession theory incorporates aspects
of the extremes of the controversies by recognizing when each of
the patterns or processes occur. However, far from obviating the
need to continue long-term, permanent plot studies of succession,
new motivating questions have emerged that are appropriately
examined by the BSS and other such studies. Questions that now
rise to the top of the list of motivations for the study include
those concerning 1) patterns of species assembly and assortment
in time and space, 2) the role of functional groups in succession,
3) the place and significance of invasive exotic species in mid-
and late-successional communities, 4) how species life histories
and morphologies relate to their invasion and persistence, and 5)
the role of episodic events in succession. Succession is driven
by a suite of processes that occur to different degrees in all
plant and animal communities. Because successional trajectories
are so obviously dynamic, they provide a powerful stage for
disentangling the web of interactions that characterizes
communities and ecosystems.
There was a management rationale behind the abandonment of the
fields adjacent to the old-growth Mettler's Woods. Allowing the
fields to succeed from the herbaceous plants of agriculture to
shrubby communities and ultimately to forest, would buffer the
sensitive old woods from the external environment, and perhaps
ultimately make a more secure forest environment. Therefore
eight of the 10 fields in the BSS are adjacent to the old-growth
forest. Other fields on the original property were to be used
for demonstration or manipulative research. Manipulations would
not be permitted in the old woods, and only sparingly in the
fields of the BSS.
|
| The People | The Context | The Motivations and Questions |
|