|
Although
ecosystem science began as a holistic effort, an increasing proportion
of ecosystem scientists devote their efforts to breaking down complex
natural systems and understanding component processes. As our understanding
of ecosystem complexity increases, the fundamental goals of synthesis
and prediction become even more challenging and quantitative modeling
is of increasing importance.
Quantitative
models provide a means to test our understanding of ecosystems by allowing
us to explore the interactions among observation, synthesis, and prediction.
The utility of models for synthesis and prediction is obvious. The
role of quantitative models in informing and guiding observation and experimentation
is perhaps less often appreciated, but equally valuable.
Modeling
has clearly become an integral part of the “toolkit” of many ecosystem
scientists. It can also be argued, however, that a gulf has developed
between empirical researchers and modelers, and that the gulf is an unhealthy
symptom of lack of both communication and recognition of the critical
role of models in all 3 of the fundamental goals of ecosystem science.
Recent years have seen
dramatic advancements in the computational power and mathematical tools
available to modelers. Methodological advances in areas ranging from
remote sensing to molecular techniques have significantly improved our
ability to parameterize and validate models at a wide range of spatial
scales. The body of traditional, mechanistic, empirical research is
also growing phenomenally. Ecosystem science is ripe for major gains
in the synthetic and predictive power of its models, and that this comes
at a time of growing need by society for quantitative models that can
inform debate about critical environmental issues.
|